On-line Remedy In Montana Bridger Peaks Counseling

- Ron Suarez

If you’re a teenager who’s dealing with social nervousness – or you’re the parent or guardian of a teen who you think you studied could be – reserving an online session with a certified therapist can be a game-changing determination. With a talented therapist and a teen who’s dedicated to overcoming social anxiousness working together, something calmerry review is possible. Is he or she wanting to go to parties and social occasions or do they attempt to avoid such festivities at all costs? Does the teen converse confidently, make eye contact, and share information about themselves (e.g., their hobbies and what makes them tick?). The less social a teen is, the extra likely it’s that they’re experiencing social anxiety disorder. I discovered this to be a thought-about, well structured and balanced evaluate.

Seventy-one p.c stated the providers total were both very good or wonderful. Ally is a senior editor for Verywell, who covers topics within the well being, wellness, and way of life spaces. She has written for The Washington Post, The Guardian, BBC Future, and more. Those using a desktop browser can enable the accessibility preferences on their account, whereas cellular customers can use their device’s native accessibility features. Everyday Health supports Group Black and its mission to extend greater diversity in media voices and media possession.

Unlike Talkspace, all of BetterHelp’s pricing plans embody a weekly stay video session. To enroll, full an automated assessment, and they’ll match you with your greatest fit. “As a psychologist, I’ve discovered on-line remedy to be surprisingly efficient,” says Dr. Paula Durlofsky, who practices in Pennsylvania. All of the totally different on-line counseling platforms vary a bit in how they function and the way the communication between you and your therapist is handled. Many of these platforms are just like nose to nose counseling except that they’re performed via on-line chat rooms, video chats or cellphone calls. Some of the benefits of the Betterhelp platform is that it matches you with one of the best and most related therapist based mostly in your solutions to it’s screening questionnaire.

We encrypt all data utilizing 256 bit SSL security and are HIPAA compliant. Only your prescribing supplier may have entry to your info. You would possibly feel relieved that you’ve been able to unburden your self, or even awe at the means your counselor “gets” you. Like every relationship, there’s often a honeymoon period, by which you admire and respect your counselor, assured in their capacity to heal you. Cognitive behavioral therapy changed the definition of counseling, in accordance with Rossi. It is now extra behavior-focused and psychodynamic approaches have become much less common.

Of course, psychotherapy is what you make of it and is dependent upon how keen you’re to work on yourself. If you put in the effort with a therapist who is an effective match for you, we’re confident that you are going to be a part of the thousands of others who have left optimistic evaluations. Online remedy additionally helps you save money that you could be in any other case spend to see a therapist via conventional in-person remedy sessions, similar to fuel, bus fares, or parking fees. About Our Company – Learn extra about us and our mission to offer useful, inexpensive psychological health care.

Many mental well being professionals and organizations run on-line programs, webinars, and workshops about particular matters, such as stress administration, anxiety, and melancholy. Talking remedy costs can be excessive, and not all health insurance plans present coverage for them. However, there are free or low value on-line therapy choices to suppose about. Many standards were thought-about when selecting the best online remedy platforms. The most necessary being the therapist’s skills and credibility, pricing, ease of use, buyer evaluations, accessibility and insurance coverage coverage. The sign-up process is much like the other choices on the listing — you fill out a questionnaire and are matched with a therapist.

We recognize this to be certainly one of many steps to take part in the calls to action made by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. We proceed to explore methods during which we can proceed to assist and be allies to Indigenous communities. Most are due to ethical or authorized issues, corresponding to conflicts of interest.

Like some other type of remedy, on-line therapy has benefits and disadvantages. Considering these can help an individual decide whether online therapy may be right for them. In addition, some apps enable people to connect with trained therapists or peers who are experiencing related issues. Some folks choose using online boards to attach with others who are in or have experienced similar conditions. Through these forums, an individual can discover assist, recommendation, and encouragement from peers.

Furthermore, virtual therapy can save you from intensive and complicated points sooner or later. Secondly, with digital remedy, you can feel more comfy sharing private data that you simply might not be ready to share in in-person therapy. Additionally, you’ll have the ability to register on any online remedy platform together with your nickname to cover your identity. In addition, there are other options too that need to be considered before choosing the best online therapy service, as an example, pricing, plans, and therapy format choices . Fortunately, you don’t need to be involved anymore as a result of this submit got you.

I consider she understands our struggles and is open to making an attempt different approaches to assist to resolve them. There aren’t any phrases to explain how good Thriveworks is being good for me. My counselor provides me lots of support and assist me to cope with my issues. Shah was great and helps me on a observe that works nice for me! He sounds right down to earth and already opened my eyes to issues I hadn’t thought about, simply within the first session.

Talkspace is a user-friendly, subscription-based on-line remedy firm that gives a quantity of services , as nicely as quite lots of communication options, and a few services may be coated by insurance coverage. BetterHelp is an industry-leading online therapy supplier that covers a vast vary of therapy providers. In addition to its excessive total customer satisfaction score with the customers we surveyed, relying in your location, it may have a typically decrease subscription value than many different teletherapy providers. Once you’ve chosen a specific service that works for you, you’ll have to take some steps to schedule your first on-line remedy session. As such, many of Talkspace’s accredited therapists are skilled in serving to patients deal with anxiousness and stress, and you may request this specific sort of support in the course of the matching course of. The site also notes they supply therapists who have experience working with teenagers ages thirteen to 17 and drugs management is offered if deemed necessary.

Talkspace is well known within the business as being a frontrunner in online counseling and therapy. This may be due in large part to their wide reaching promoting campaigns. They characteristic a simple to use entrance finish, aggressive pricing, plenty of good evaluations online from people who have used their counseling platform. They have now helped over 1 read more million shoppers worldwide, and are a good selection for anybody with social nervousness to a minimal of try their service. Do you’ve hassle staying asleep and sleeping through the complete night?

Broadband State Agencies fail to answer basic questions about how the Digital Divide was created in their state.

- Bruce Kushnick

The agencies, politicians, advocates and even the investigative reporters don’t even know who is to blame, or what are the core issues that need to be addressed to fix it.

America is now giving over $100 billion in government funding to ‘solve the Digital Divide. We’ve checked multiple county and state Digital Divide agency sites and can not find one state that identified the players — such as the incumbent phone utilities -like Verizon NY, or that AT&T California covers most of LA County. In fact, throughout America, AT&T, Verizon, and CenturyLink, with the help of the cable companies, were responsible for the creation of the Digital Divide. There is no history, no accountability for the state commitments to replace the existing copper wires with fiber optics, the amount of money that was collected (tax perks, rights of way and rate increases, universal service), or the cross-subsidies of the other lines of business via the accounting going on today, now, in 2022, where the construction budgets are diverted to wireless. (We believe it is illegal or bordering on it in various states.)

Starting in 1991, virtually every phone company filed for both state deployment as well as did a federal filing known as video-dialtone, to upgrade cities. The laws were changed multiple times over the decades and billions were collected. This chart is of the video dialtone filings with the FCC. Notice that they were “permanent”. And yet, as if on cue, after the state laws were passed, the companies quietly cancelled these upgrades, as well as the state upgrades, And this is a decade before the next round, Verizon’s FiOS or AT&T’s U-verse, circa 2004. Much of the unserved-underserved areas in 2022 are in territories of the utilities that should have been upgraded, as customers had increases to pay to do this in most states.

And history shows that throwing money at those who have defacto controls over the state wired critical infrastructure, (and have created massive skunkworks networks that are working against the public interests) is a bad idea and won’t work. The government agencies, and most of the advocates, etc. don’t even know who to blame for the creation of the Digital Divide, allowing AT&T et al to not be held accountable and instead rewarding them with government subsidies for their previous failures to do upgrades of the state utility networks.

This was the starting point, based on America’s first National Broadband Plan, NII, and was presented circa 1991–1993 by VP AL Gore, which he dubbed, ‘the Information Superhighway’.

How was it possible that every company filed for millions of fiber optic lines in almost every state and then have almost all of the plans halted? — that’s why we call them Big Telecom?

And to those cities who have been struggling to get upgraded or those who live in rural areas that actually paid thousands of dollars for a fiber optic connection you never got — don’t you believe that the broadband agencies have an obligation to tell the public the truth — and not leave out material facts?

The Digital Divide did not start with the pandemic… It just exposed that the Emperor had no clothes.

FCC $9 Billion 5G Giveaway.

- Bruce Kushnick

The FCC has decided that it should give $9 billion for the deployment of wireless 5G, but the FCC has never examined that there has been a massive cross-subsidies of the wireless networks, where Local phone customers have ended up being charged for the fiber optic networks used by Verizon and AT&T wireless. We filed for the FCC to investigate these cross-subsidies, which include 5G wireless. Click to Read the Filing

FACT SHEET: Verizon Massachusetts Fiber Optic Failure

- Bruce Kushnick

FACT SHEET:

Verizon Massachusetts Fiber Optic Failure, 1994-2020

1994: Verizon Massachusetts files with the Mass Department of Public Utilities to have fiber optic services, to replace the existing copper wires. The included colleges and universities, hospitals, as well as 330,000 residence and businesses.

1994: This same plan was also filed with the FCC known as “Video Dialtone”, and claimed the majority of the entire state would be finished by 2010.

“NYNEX proposes to deploy hybrid fiber optic and coaxial (HFC) broadband networks that will provide advanced voice, data, and video services, including interactive video entertainment, multimedia education and health care services… “NYNEX plans to deploy this type of network to the majority of its customers by the year 2010.”

1995: Verizon filed and was granted “alternative regulations”, which gave the company

1999: In New Networks institute filed a complaint in Massachusetts outlining how Verizon (then New England Telephone) convinced regulators that they would rewire the state starting in 1995 if the company got massive financial incentives – Deregulation — the removal of regulation that examined and limited their profits. The Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, never acted on our complaint.

2005: Verizon announces FiOS and gets some municipality franchises for cable TV

2007: We presented testimony in front of the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Telecommunications Utilities and Energy.

2010: Verizon announces it is halting the fiber optic deployments in all states.

2016:  Bait and Switch: Verizon announced it would be upgrading 100% of Boston and spend $300 million dollars.  Instead, most of this has been a bait and switch to use the fiber optic wires that should go to homes to instead roll out wireless, and 5G Wireless.

We documented the story in articles in Huff Post and Medium.

IRREGULATORS Big WIN: We Freed the States from the FCC

- regadmin

Bruce Kushnick, Managing Director bruce at New Networks dot com

Scott McCollough, Esq. Counsel  wsmc at dotlaw dot biz

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

IRREGULATORS BIG WIN: We Freed the States to Get the Money Back from AT&T, Verizon & CenturyLink

(This is similar to the DC Circuit decision that freed Net Neutrality from the FCC’s control to become a state issue.)

  • We got the decision that we wanted—billions of dollars per state can now be freed to solve the Digital Divide, lower prices and bring in competition.
  • All wireless cross-subsidies can be stopped — 5G is no longer profitable.

IRREGULATORS v FCC: DC Court of Appeals Opinion, March 13th, 2020

WE CAN NOW TAKE THE NEXT STEPS 

WHAT WE NEEDED TO FIX: Unknown to most, AT&T, Verizon and CenturyLink control America’s telecommunications utilities, and over the last decade they have used the FCC’s accounting rules and formulas to charge the majority of all company-wide expenses to the local wired state-based telecommunications utilities, while the other services that are also using the same wired copper and fiber utility facilities, like broadband, internet and wireless, do not pay their fair share.

This financial shell game has made the entire state-based utility infrastructure appear unprofitable and they have relied on these distorted financial results to argue that they cannot upgrade rural areas or even inner cities, and it has been used to justify local rate increases multiple times, as well as save billions in taxes. More importantly, it is also the excuse to “shut off” the wired networks and go wireless with 5G.

Over the last five years we filed more than 18 separate pleadings and reports to stop the continuing use of these obsolete and now deformed rules. The FCC refused to take action, claiming that the rules didn’t apply, even though the companies still use them and the state commissions still accept them to the detriment of utility customers.

We brought this case to expose one of the largest accounting scandals in American history and to get a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals – D.C. Circuit—and we won. The Court made clear that the FCC does not have control over the state accounting and the states are free to adopt new regulations. This also allows the states to go after the billions in cross-subsidies and overcharging that has been costing America an estimated $50-60 billion annually.

This is one of the largest victories for consumers in recent years. The states now clearly have the authority to pick up the mantle and act to narrow the Digital Divide, promote Digital Inclusion, lower prices, bring in competition and end the cross subsidization of 5G by the public utility. And it provides a national broadband plan which is not funded by government subsidies but by dismantling this financial shell game.

This is a partial list of what this decision means going forward:

  • We help to take down the billions in Corporate Operations overcharging: In NY, Verizon Local Service was overcharged an estimated $1.5 billion dollars a year for the corporate jets, the executive pay, and the lawyers and lobbyists pushing anti-customer agendas. Now a state can now stop the billions of dollars in unrelated expenses that has been put into local service and caused rate increases.
  • We help to take down billions in tax losses: Today, the state utility pays the majority of expenses, even if it has nothing to do with Local Service. In NY, Verizon has been showing artificial losses of $2 billion annually. The states can stop the cross-subsidies and let these companies pay their fair share of taxes.
  • All subsidies to wireless can now be stopped by the states: The states are free to stop the cross subsidies where the fiber optic networks are being built for the benefit of the wireless company, instead of properly upgrading cities and towns, especially in more rural areas.
  • 5G Is Not Profitable Once We Do This.
  • We take down the 75-25% rule with this decision: Today, 75% of the costs of the wired network expenses (even for wireless, broadband and internet) are dumped into ‘local service’; wireless and these other services got a free ride — Not anymore. The states can come up with their own allocation factors.
  • We just lowered prices billions of dollars if the state decides to go after the money: After all of this shell game is exposed and removed, a state can make the price be ‘incremental’ — and it can decide that local service and the wired networks should only be based on the actual costs, and not made up expenses.
  • We now present billions in new found cash to solve the Digital Divide:  Removing this long standing shell game means billions can now be properly allocated to build out the wired state-utility infrastructure for broadband to EVERYONE in the state.
  • Cities can now build out their networks. NYC’s Master Internet Plan to solve the Digital Divide requires government funds and never held Verizon NY accountable. The City of New York, like all cities across America trying to get a digital future for every citizen, should have examined the financial cross-subsidies that were exposed in this case and the bait-and-switch funding for wireless. Now, NYC can go after the money and provide a fiber optic future to everyone.

NOTE: We lost this DC Court decision on standing: Since the rules don’t apply, we can’t be harmed.  We now have clarity about these cost accounting rules. The states are free to do what they want. Our strategy in bringing this case was to secure a definitive answer about the rights of states vs the control by the FCC over the financial accounting. The Court made it clear that the states are independent from the FCC and from the application of the federal accounting formulas known as “Part 36”.

“This means that any injuries the petitioners suffer through the application of outmoded Part 36 rules to price-cap carriers are traceable not to the Commission’s freeze order but to the states’ voluntary and independent decisions to use the rules of Part 36 for their own purposes.” (PAGE 9)

“Price Caps” Need Investigation and Repair: AT&T et al. and the states may say: “We are under price caps and the utility expenses are no longer examined.”

ANSWER: The States can now go back, do the audits, and stop the financial shell game. “Price caps” is a form of regulation that was supposed to keep prices capped and reasonable, which never worked. This was to increase the companies’ profits, which were supposed to be used to replace the existing copper wires with fiber optics—and that never happened. Instead, using the FCC’s corrupted formulas, it allowed for this massive overcharging.  Prices are no longer ‘just and reasonable’ when you can charge local phone customers to build the wireless networks or pay for the corporate jets.

AT&T CALIFORNIA DEEP DIVE ARCHIVES, 2002-2019

- regadmin

DEEP DIVE ARCHIVE:

Huffington Post/Medium articles about AT&T and California

BACK IN THE STACKS: 2002-2010

https://newnetworks.com/mergersandoutcomes.htm

 

FCC Accounting Rules Caused Verizon NY Cross-Subsidies

- regadmin

IRREGULATORS Take the FCC to Court Based on Verizon New York 2017 Annual Report. Billions Revealed in Cross-Subsidies Caused by the FCC’s Manipulated Accounting Rules. This is Happening Nationwide.

On June 3rd, 2019, the IRREGULATORS won Round 1, the right to take the FCC to court over their cost accounting rules. However, the case relies on the Verizon New York financial annual reports, the latest published May 30th, 2019. It is one of the largest accounting scandals in American history and it impacts all telecommunications in the United States – and all FCC decisions and proceedings, and almost all state decisions that relied on the FCC’s work.

PRESS: We created a by-the-numbers walk-through of the official Verizon New York 2017 Annual Report to spotlight some of the specific harms.

http://irregulators.org/verizonnywalkthrough/

The FCC’s rules were supposed to divide up the expenses that are to be paid by the different lines of business, such as Verizon Wireless or Verizon Online, for the use of the infrastructure and services of the state telecommunications utility – Verizon New York.

Unfortunately, the rules became corrupted and the expenses to be paid are set, “frozen”, to reflect the year 2000, 19 years ago. Using the Verizon New York annual reports, we prove that the rules are still in use and they now divert the majority of all expenses into Local Service, the basic POTS, phone service category. This has caused billions of dollars annually to be misallocated by charging phone customers excessive Corporate Operations expenses, everything from the corporate jets and golf tournaments to executive pay. It also diverted the construction budgets to pay for the wireless deployments. And Verizon was able to create losses that were used not only for rate increases, but to avoid paying billions in taxes. Ultimately, Verizon claims it is not profitable to upgrade rural or low income areas and is now planning a bait-and-switch, claiming 5G wireless will fix everything.

How crazy does it get?

  • Verizon NY 2017 Local Service was charged $1.8 billion, 61%, of Corporate Operations expense, making it unprofitable. Local Service had revenues of $1.1 billion. (“61%” is based entirely on the FCC’s FREEZE and it has been this way for 2 decades.)
  • Taxes: The Verizon NY 2017 Annual Report showed losses of $2.6 billion and a tax benefit of over $900 million. Verizon NY has shown losses of over $2 billion a year for almost the last decade, (with caveats).
  • Construction: Local Service paid the majority, $1.2 billion, in construction and maintenance, but only an estimated hundred million was attributed to the copper wires.
  • The NY Attorney General’s Office in 2012 found 75% of the utility construction budgets were being diverted to wireless or FiOS video services. This is instead of upgrading the NYC and NY State infrastructure.
  • Rates Increases of Over 100%: Since 2005, every wireline customer paid over $3,000 a line based on increases granted using artificial losses, through 2018.
  • It Created the Digital Divide by claiming areas of the state utility were unprofitable, when, in reality, there was enough money to have been doing continuous upgrades. In fact, rates should have been in steep decline.
  • This happened in every state because the FCC rules are federal. The last available data in 2007 matched in every state-based utility.
  • Customer overcharging, nationwide, is estimated to be $50-60 billion annually, based on what is happening in New York.

IRREGULATORS v FCC — In December, 2018, the FCC decided to extend the FREEZE rules for 6 more years. We could not let this stand and get worse. We have the actual financial books as well as the expertise to figure out what happened, but it has taken almost a decade of investigation to understand this accounting puzzle. No other state we know of still publishes financial reports; the FCC stopped publishing the financials in 2007.  We filed 18 separate reports and comments in this proceeding (Docket 80-286) to document our claims since 2015, which the FCC has mostly ignored. http://irregulators.org/our-work-reports-filings/

Settlement with Verizon NY and the NY Public Service Commission, July 2018: Our analysis and methodology was used in an investigation of Verizon New York that started in 2015 and was settled in July 2018. Estimated at $300-$500 million, 32,000 lines of fiber optics will be deployed in unserved areas and the existing networks will be maintained. But this settlement did not go far enough to fix the existing problems or deal with the FCC’s corrupted accounting.  https://bit.ly/2O25OqQ

The Bottom Line: No one knows or understands that the FCC’s rules have become corrupted over the last 2 decades, that they actually control the state-utility accounting and that they are still in use, nationwide. Stopping the Corporate Operations expenses, the cross-subsidies of the other Verizon lines of business with the state telecommunications utility, especially wireless, and making them pay market prices, will immediately lower rates on all services – not just basic phone service, and could bring billions back to do full upgrades of the telecommunication wired infrastructure. Cleaning up this long standing financial shell game also solves some of the Digital Divide concerns and could even create financial support as part of any settlement.

5G is not profitable once the cross-subsidies for wireless are removed. 5G is nothing more than another technology promise-them-anything bait-and-switch to get rid of state and federal regulations at the FCC and in state legislatures. (This is on top of the health concerns of putting a microwave antenna, always on, on a lamppost directly outside someone’s bedroom window.)

Nationwide Problem: These are federal rules that have been manipulated by the FCC, either by negligence or design.  Thus, all states, not only in the Verizon service area, but in the AT&T and CenturyLink territories, have the same financial issues that need to be fixed immediately. Taking the FCC to court is the first step in this direction.

IRREGULATORS is an independent consortium of retired and semi-retired senior telecom experts, analysts, forensic auditors, and lawyers who are former staffers from the FCC, state advocate and Attorneys General Office, as well as telecom auditors and consultants.

http://irregulators.org/who-we-are/