Bell Atlantic Plan Neglects Poor, Advocate Says
archive.nytimes.com • 5 min read
New corporate welfare state? Fiber optics & the Digital Divide
Verizon NY FiOS– 500,000 Lines added by July 16, 2023?
Verizon New York has a deadline to provide 1/2 million fiber optic lines as part of the FiOS cable TV franchise. — July 16, 2023. We have a long history about this deployment to have 100% of residential locations covered by 2014 (the deal left out the business locations, however.) We worked with the de Blasio as advocate — requesting the city do a full survey to see what had not been done — which was based on interviews and discussions with the installers, not to mention the problems with other cities and state’s fiber deployments.
We also suggested that the City take Verizon to court and apply the penalties, as well as join in the investigation of the manipulated accounting on the state level— which was part of an effort by ConnectNY coalition– resulting in 30000+ fiber lines being put in unserved areas…but the state dropped anything dealing with the cross-subsidies of wireless— vs the wireline utility construction budgets used for fiber to the home.
Moreover, unless I missed it — The NY state reports and info never mentions this commitment and the FCC filings by the Latimer plan (which I referenced, by Urban League at the FCC) claimed that there was no mention of unserved areas– or redlining, in NYC, even though the state comptroller report, which Mayor de Blasio quoted. was all about the holes in deployment being related to the failure to upgrade lower income areas of the City. –
-This extended agreement was supposed to close gaps in deployment. But, his was supposed to be tracked — I can’t find the public docs. There is no mention in virtually any city or state discussion of ‘broadband’ funded via local rates, put in as Title II and the state telecommunications public utility — or anyone asking fundamental questions —- So. Verizon put the networks in and no one can afford it– so we give gov. subsidies to the companies– without audits of the financials, and then the city decides to put in ‘wireless’ in areas because no one can afford it, or in areas that were never finished? (Some other NYC proceeding.) or the construction for fiber is now being diverted to wireless, illegally since it is title II. (a fact that directly contradicts the Net Neutrality issue.) — And under the new mayor, is this NYC Administration going to do fines or call for investigations of the books or… ?
And, we see the foresight at work — July 16th, 2023 is a Saturday. –And no. FWA Wireless is not a substitute for a fiber to the home service, which we expect will filed, if it hasn’t already. it is a bait and switch.
Verizon NY Fiber is Title II
On-line Remedy In Montana Bridger Peaks Counseling
If you’re a teenager who’s dealing with social nervousness – or you’re the parent or guardian of a teen who you think you studied could be – reserving an online session with a certified therapist can be a game-changing determination. With a talented therapist and a teen who’s dedicated to overcoming social anxiousness working together, something calmerry review is possible. Is he or she wanting to go to parties and social occasions or do they attempt to avoid such festivities at all costs? Does the teen converse confidently, make eye contact, and share information about themselves (e.g., their hobbies and what makes them tick?). The less social a teen is, the extra likely it’s that they’re experiencing social anxiety disorder. I discovered this to be a thought-about, well structured and balanced evaluate.
Seventy-one p.c stated the providers total were both very good or wonderful. Ally is a senior editor for Verywell, who covers topics within the well being, wellness, and way of life spaces. She has written for The Washington Post, The Guardian, BBC Future, and more. Those using a desktop browser can enable the accessibility preferences on their account, whereas cellular customers can use their device’s native accessibility features. Everyday Health supports Group Black and its mission to extend greater diversity in media voices and media possession.
Unlike Talkspace, all of BetterHelp’s pricing plans embody a weekly stay video session. To enroll, full an automated assessment, and they’ll match you with your greatest fit. “As a psychologist, I’ve discovered on-line remedy to be surprisingly efficient,” says Dr. Paula Durlofsky, who practices in Pennsylvania. All of the totally different on-line counseling platforms vary a bit in how they function and the way the communication between you and your therapist is handled. Many of these platforms are just like nose to nose counseling except that they’re performed via on-line chat rooms, video chats or cellphone calls. Some of the benefits of the Betterhelp platform is that it matches you with one of the best and most related therapist based mostly in your solutions to it’s screening questionnaire.
We encrypt all data utilizing 256 bit SSL security and are HIPAA compliant. Only your prescribing supplier may have entry to your info. You would possibly feel relieved that you’ve been able to unburden your self, or even awe at the means your counselor “gets” you. Like every relationship, there’s often a honeymoon period, by which you admire and respect your counselor, assured in their capacity to heal you. Cognitive behavioral therapy changed the definition of counseling, in accordance with Rossi. It is now extra behavior-focused and psychodynamic approaches have become much less common.
Of course, psychotherapy is what you make of it and is dependent upon how keen you’re to work on yourself. If you put in the effort with a therapist who is an effective match for you, we’re confident that you are going to be a part of the thousands of others who have left optimistic evaluations. Online remedy additionally helps you save money that you could be in any other case spend to see a therapist via conventional in-person remedy sessions, similar to fuel, bus fares, or parking fees. About Our Company – Learn extra about us and our mission to offer useful, inexpensive psychological health care.
Many mental well being professionals and organizations run on-line programs, webinars, and workshops about particular matters, such as stress administration, anxiety, and melancholy. Talking remedy costs can be excessive, and not all health insurance plans present coverage for them. However, there are free or low value on-line therapy choices to suppose about. Many standards were thought-about when selecting the best online remedy platforms. The most necessary being the therapist’s skills and credibility, pricing, ease of use, buyer evaluations, accessibility and insurance coverage coverage. The sign-up process is much like the other choices on the listing — you fill out a questionnaire and are matched with a therapist.
We recognize this to be certainly one of many steps to take part in the calls to action made by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. We proceed to explore methods during which we can proceed to assist and be allies to Indigenous communities. Most are due to ethical or authorized issues, corresponding to conflicts of interest.
Like some other type of remedy, on-line therapy has benefits and disadvantages. Considering these can help an individual decide whether online therapy may be right for them. In addition, some apps enable people to connect with trained therapists or peers who are experiencing related issues. Some folks choose using online boards to attach with others who are in or have experienced similar conditions. Through these forums, an individual can discover assist, recommendation, and encouragement from peers.
Furthermore, virtual therapy can save you from intensive and complicated points sooner or later. Secondly, with digital remedy, you can feel more comfy sharing private data that you simply might not be ready to share in in-person therapy. Additionally, you’ll have the ability to register on any online remedy platform together with your nickname to cover your identity. In addition, there are other options too that need to be considered before choosing the best online therapy service, as an example, pricing, plans, and therapy format choices . Fortunately, you don’t need to be involved anymore as a result of this submit got you.
I consider she understands our struggles and is open to making an attempt different approaches to assist to resolve them. There aren’t any phrases to explain how good Thriveworks is being good for me. My counselor provides me lots of support and assist me to cope with my issues. Shah was great and helps me on a observe that works nice for me! He sounds right down to earth and already opened my eyes to issues I hadn’t thought about, simply within the first session.
Talkspace is a user-friendly, subscription-based on-line remedy firm that gives a quantity of services , as nicely as quite lots of communication options, and a few services may be coated by insurance coverage. BetterHelp is an industry-leading online therapy supplier that covers a vast vary of therapy providers. In addition to its excessive total customer satisfaction score with the customers we surveyed, relying in your location, it may have a typically decrease subscription value than many different teletherapy providers. Once you’ve chosen a specific service that works for you, you’ll have to take some steps to schedule your first on-line remedy session. As such, many of Talkspace’s accredited therapists are skilled in serving to patients deal with anxiousness and stress, and you may request this specific sort of support in the course of the matching course of. The site also notes they supply therapists who have experience working with teenagers ages thirteen to 17 and drugs management is offered if deemed necessary.
Talkspace is well known within the business as being a frontrunner in online counseling and therapy. This may be due in large part to their wide reaching promoting campaigns. They characteristic a simple to use entrance finish, aggressive pricing, plenty of good evaluations online from people who have used their counseling platform. They have now helped over 1 read more million shoppers worldwide, and are a good selection for anybody with social nervousness to a minimal of try their service. Do you’ve hassle staying asleep and sleeping through the complete night?
Broadband State Agencies fail to answer basic questions about how the Digital Divide was created in their state.
The agencies, politicians, advocates and even the investigative reporters don’t even know who is to blame, or what are the core issues that need to be addressed to fix it.
America is now giving over $100 billion in government funding to ‘solve the Digital Divide. We’ve checked multiple county and state Digital Divide agency sites and can not find one state that identified the players — such as the incumbent phone utilities -like Verizon NY, or that AT&T California covers most of LA County. In fact, throughout America, AT&T, Verizon, and CenturyLink, with the help of the cable companies, were responsible for the creation of the Digital Divide. There is no history, no accountability for the state commitments to replace the existing copper wires with fiber optics, the amount of money that was collected (tax perks, rights of way and rate increases, universal service), or the cross-subsidies of the other lines of business via the accounting going on today, now, in 2022, where the construction budgets are diverted to wireless. (We believe it is illegal or bordering on it in various states.)
Starting in 1991, virtually every phone company filed for both state deployment as well as did a federal filing known as video-dialtone, to upgrade cities. The laws were changed multiple times over the decades and billions were collected. This chart is of the video dialtone filings with the FCC. Notice that they were “permanent”. And yet, as if on cue, after the state laws were passed, the companies quietly cancelled these upgrades, as well as the state upgrades, And this is a decade before the next round, Verizon’s FiOS or AT&T’s U-verse, circa 2004. Much of the unserved-underserved areas in 2022 are in territories of the utilities that should have been upgraded, as customers had increases to pay to do this in most states.
And history shows that throwing money at those who have defacto controls over the state wired critical infrastructure, (and have created massive skunkworks networks that are working against the public interests) is a bad idea and won’t work. The government agencies, and most of the advocates, etc. don’t even know who to blame for the creation of the Digital Divide, allowing AT&T et al to not be held accountable and instead rewarding them with government subsidies for their previous failures to do upgrades of the state utility networks.
This was the starting point, based on America’s first National Broadband Plan, NII, and was presented circa 1991–1993 by VP AL Gore, which he dubbed, ‘the Information Superhighway’.
How was it possible that every company filed for millions of fiber optic lines in almost every state and then have almost all of the plans halted? — that’s why we call them Big Telecom?
And to those cities who have been struggling to get upgraded or those who live in rural areas that actually paid thousands of dollars for a fiber optic connection you never got — don’t you believe that the broadband agencies have an obligation to tell the public the truth — and not leave out material facts?
The Digital Divide did not start with the pandemic… It just exposed that the Emperor had no clothes.
IRREGULATORS rejection NY
Read the first rejection letter from the NY Public Service Commission
FCC $9 Billion 5G Giveaway.
The FCC has decided that it should give $9 billion for the deployment of wireless 5G, but the FCC has never examined that there has been a massive cross-subsidies of the wireless networks, where Local phone customers have ended up being charged for the fiber optic networks used by Verizon and AT&T wireless. We filed for the FCC to investigate these cross-subsidies, which include 5G wireless. Click to Read the Filing
FACT SHEET: Verizon Massachusetts Fiber Optic Failure
FACT SHEET:
Verizon Massachusetts Fiber Optic Failure, 1994-2020
1994: Verizon Massachusetts files with the Mass Department of Public Utilities to have fiber optic services, to replace the existing copper wires. The included colleges and universities, hospitals, as well as 330,000 residence and businesses.
1994: This same plan was also filed with the FCC known as “Video Dialtone”, and claimed the majority of the entire state would be finished by 2010.
“NYNEX proposes to deploy hybrid fiber optic and coaxial (HFC) broadband networks that will provide advanced voice, data, and video services, including interactive video entertainment, multimedia education and health care services… “NYNEX plans to deploy this type of network to the majority of its customers by the year 2010.”
1995: Verizon filed and was granted “alternative regulations”, which gave the company
1999: In New Networks institute filed a complaint in Massachusetts outlining how Verizon (then New England Telephone) convinced regulators that they would rewire the state starting in 1995 if the company got massive financial incentives – Deregulation — the removal of regulation that examined and limited their profits. The Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, never acted on our complaint.
2005: Verizon announces FiOS and gets some municipality franchises for cable TV
2007: We presented testimony in front of the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Telecommunications Utilities and Energy.
2010: Verizon announces it is halting the fiber optic deployments in all states.
2016: Bait and Switch: Verizon announced it would be upgrading 100% of Boston and spend $300 million dollars. Instead, most of this has been a bait and switch to use the fiber optic wires that should go to homes to instead roll out wireless, and 5G Wireless.
We documented the story in articles in Huff Post and Medium.
- Verizon’s FiOS Deployment in Boston Is Fiber-To-The-B.S.
- Billions in Cross-Subsidies Could Bring Fiber Optic Broadband to Massachusetts Cities—But Remain Unchallenged, 2017
- Verizon’s Boston FiOS Fiber to the Home Plan Needs Investigating—Now.
- Verizon’s Boston FiOS Fiber-Wireless Bait-N-Switch
- Verizon, Fiber, Boston, Wireless: History Repeats Itself, Yet Again., 2016
- Verizon’s Boston Faux-FiOS, “One Fiber” Strategy Exposed
- More Exposed: Verizon’s FiOS-Wireless Bait & Switch in Boston
- Verizon’s $300 Million Shell Game in Boston and Cross-Subsidizing Wireless
- Verizon, Boston, Bernie, Fiber and the Facts
- Verizon Wireless’s 5G Deployment is a 1 Gig Fairy Tale.
- Verizon’s Massive East Coast FiOS Scandal: 41 Percent Coverage Using ‘Weasel Room’ Math 2015
IRREGULATORS Big WIN: We Freed the States from the FCC
Bruce Kushnick, Managing Director bruce at New Networks dot com
Scott McCollough, Esq. Counsel wsmc at dotlaw dot biz
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
IRREGULATORS BIG WIN: We Freed the States to Get the Money Back from AT&T, Verizon & CenturyLink
(This is similar to the DC Circuit decision that freed Net Neutrality from the FCC’s control to become a state issue.)
- We got the decision that we wanted—billions of dollars per state can now be freed to solve the Digital Divide, lower prices and bring in competition.
- All wireless cross-subsidies can be stopped — 5G is no longer profitable.
IRREGULATORS v FCC: DC Court of Appeals Opinion, March 13th, 2020
WE CAN NOW TAKE THE NEXT STEPS
WHAT WE NEEDED TO FIX: Unknown to most, AT&T, Verizon and CenturyLink control America’s telecommunications utilities, and over the last decade they have used the FCC’s accounting rules and formulas to charge the majority of all company-wide expenses to the local wired state-based telecommunications utilities, while the other services that are also using the same wired copper and fiber utility facilities, like broadband, internet and wireless, do not pay their fair share.
This financial shell game has made the entire state-based utility infrastructure appear unprofitable and they have relied on these distorted financial results to argue that they cannot upgrade rural areas or even inner cities, and it has been used to justify local rate increases multiple times, as well as save billions in taxes. More importantly, it is also the excuse to “shut off” the wired networks and go wireless with 5G.
Over the last five years we filed more than 18 separate pleadings and reports to stop the continuing use of these obsolete and now deformed rules. The FCC refused to take action, claiming that the rules didn’t apply, even though the companies still use them and the state commissions still accept them to the detriment of utility customers.
We brought this case to expose one of the largest accounting scandals in American history and to get a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals – D.C. Circuit—and we won. The Court made clear that the FCC does not have control over the state accounting and the states are free to adopt new regulations. This also allows the states to go after the billions in cross-subsidies and overcharging that has been costing America an estimated $50-60 billion annually.
This is one of the largest victories for consumers in recent years. The states now clearly have the authority to pick up the mantle and act to narrow the Digital Divide, promote Digital Inclusion, lower prices, bring in competition and end the cross subsidization of 5G by the public utility. And it provides a national broadband plan which is not funded by government subsidies but by dismantling this financial shell game.
This is a partial list of what this decision means going forward:
- IRREGULATOR Treasure Map: Billions for Broadband in Your State and Refunds on Your Communications Bills.
- We help to take down the billions in Corporate Operations overcharging: In NY, Verizon Local Service was overcharged an estimated $1.5 billion dollars a year for the corporate jets, the executive pay, and the lawyers and lobbyists pushing anti-customer agendas. Now a state can now stop the billions of dollars in unrelated expenses that has been put into local service and caused rate increases.
- We help to take down billions in tax losses: Today, the state utility pays the majority of expenses, even if it has nothing to do with Local Service. In NY, Verizon has been showing artificial losses of $2 billion annually. The states can stop the cross-subsidies and let these companies pay their fair share of taxes.
- All subsidies to wireless can now be stopped by the states: The states are free to stop the cross subsidies where the fiber optic networks are being built for the benefit of the wireless company, instead of properly upgrading cities and towns, especially in more rural areas.
- 5G Is Not Profitable Once We Do This.
- We take down the 75-25% rule with this decision: Today, 75% of the costs of the wired network expenses (even for wireless, broadband and internet) are dumped into ‘local service’; wireless and these other services got a free ride — Not anymore. The states can come up with their own allocation factors.
- We just lowered prices billions of dollars if the state decides to go after the money: After all of this shell game is exposed and removed, a state can make the price be ‘incremental’ — and it can decide that local service and the wired networks should only be based on the actual costs, and not made up expenses.
- We now present billions in new found cash to solve the Digital Divide: Removing this long standing shell game means billions can now be properly allocated to build out the wired state-utility infrastructure for broadband to EVERYONE in the state.
- Cities can now build out their networks. NYC’s Master Internet Plan to solve the Digital Divide requires government funds and never held Verizon NY accountable. The City of New York, like all cities across America trying to get a digital future for every citizen, should have examined the financial cross-subsidies that were exposed in this case and the bait-and-switch funding for wireless. Now, NYC can go after the money and provide a fiber optic future to everyone.
NOTE: We lost this DC Court decision on standing: Since the rules don’t apply, we can’t be harmed. We now have clarity about these cost accounting rules. The states are free to do what they want. Our strategy in bringing this case was to secure a definitive answer about the rights of states vs the control by the FCC over the financial accounting. The Court made it clear that the states are independent from the FCC and from the application of the federal accounting formulas known as “Part 36”.
“This means that any injuries the petitioners suffer through the application of outmoded Part 36 rules to price-cap carriers are traceable not to the Commission’s freeze order but to the states’ voluntary and independent decisions to use the rules of Part 36 for their own purposes.” (PAGE 9)
“Price Caps” Need Investigation and Repair: AT&T et al. and the states may say: “We are under price caps and the utility expenses are no longer examined.”
ANSWER: The States can now go back, do the audits, and stop the financial shell game. “Price caps” is a form of regulation that was supposed to keep prices capped and reasonable, which never worked. This was to increase the companies’ profits, which were supposed to be used to replace the existing copper wires with fiber optics—and that never happened. Instead, using the FCC’s corrupted formulas, it allowed for this massive overcharging. Prices are no longer ‘just and reasonable’ when you can charge local phone customers to build the wireless networks or pay for the corporate jets.
Below I quote a NY Times article interviewing the NJ Consumer advocate in 1997, who filed a complaint about the failure of Bell Atlantic (Verizon) New Jersey to bring fiber optic services to low income areas, starting in 1993- and the redlining. Yes, 3 decades ago.
“In the five years since Bell Atlantic promised to wire every home and business in New Jersey with fiber optic cable, the company has hooked up suburban business parks and large corporations and set a schedule for suburban neighborhoods, but has not yet made specific plans for the thousands of poor people who live in the state’s largest cities… Those people have paid for the fiber optic lines through their monthly bills, she said, but they have not yet benefited.”
====
It is time to correct the record and point out the factual flaws that are now creating a new corporate welfare state for AT&T, Comcast, etc. –which includes the low income ACP and BEAD monies. – but are not helping the public in the end.
The reports coming out, like the “Lewis Latimer Plan for Digital Equity and Inclusion”, are either clueless or worse they reflect the report’s funders, which include AT&T, Charter Communications, Comcast, Crown Castle, T-Mobile, and Verizon. Moreover, it is filled with a cast of other writers, almost all are or have been funded by the companies.
The report’s position (paraphrased)– give the companies more government subsidies on multiple levels. It does not hold those accountable, but wants to reward them.
Truth is: Almost every state telecom utility in America had a fiber optic plan, replacing the copper, starting in 1992; — but never delivered. Then, Verizon et al. pulled another shell game and promised fiber optics in 2004 (FiOS and AT&T, U-verse). And again stopped and instead, around 2011 the construction budgets of the utilities appear to have been diverted to wireless in a bait and switch, but still charged to customers — Virtually no state ever went back and lowered rates, or refunds.
The Latimer plan and all those plans that start at the pandemic, or worse, and they start at the failed National Broadband Plan of 2010–(which never mentioned the state plans) never even mentions now AT&T, Verizon, Centurylink (Lumen) by name and fails to identify that they created the Digital Divide. They got paid, and are still being paid, but never did the upgrades to all customers.
And this is not history — overcharging and wireless-cross-subsidies are still in play in 2023. We don’t need Corporate Welfare. Time to halt the subsidies and overcharging and use these funds in 2023 to pay for fiber upgrades, but also lower rates. (may require registration)